<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increased Funding for Parks Not An Option In Milwaukee?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cityparksblog.org/2010/01/06/increased-funding-for-parks-not-an-option-in-milwaukee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2010/01/06/increased-funding-for-parks-not-an-option-in-milwaukee/</link>
	<description>A Chronicle of the Urban Parks Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:31:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Kamps</title>
		<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2010/01/06/increased-funding-for-parks-not-an-option-in-milwaukee/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Kamps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cityparksblog.org/?p=1355#comment-947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to hear the talk iabout selling parkland. Milwaukee&#039;s park acreage-per-resident now is below the national norm.  Generations to come will need our parks even more than we do. I belong to two Milwaukee groups that are working to find adequate park funding.  I feel confident we&#039;ll be able to achieve this and be able to hand on our still-beautiful 155 parks in fine shape.  
Mary, Milwaukee]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to hear the talk iabout selling parkland. Milwaukee&#8217;s park acreage-per-resident now is below the national norm.  Generations to come will need our parks even more than we do. I belong to two Milwaukee groups that are working to find adequate park funding.  I feel confident we&#8217;ll be able to achieve this and be able to hand on our still-beautiful 155 parks in fine shape.<br />
Mary, Milwaukee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melinda</title>
		<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2010/01/06/increased-funding-for-parks-not-an-option-in-milwaukee/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melinda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cityparksblog.org/?p=1355#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this sort of talk... especially in the middle of a recession.  Guess what -- there isn&#039;t more money.  You can&#039;t just keep taxing and taxing and taxing.  

Frankly - I&#039;m tired of constantly being the piggy bank for other people&#039;s wants.  

I&#039;m fine if you want to pay for the parks -- institute a user fee.  But, to continually tax me &amp; my family for parks we&#039;ve never seen, much less use?  This kind of government entitlement thought process is bringing our country to our knees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this sort of talk&#8230; especially in the middle of a recession.  Guess what &#8212; there isn&#8217;t more money.  You can&#8217;t just keep taxing and taxing and taxing.  </p>
<p>Frankly &#8211; I&#8217;m tired of constantly being the piggy bank for other people&#8217;s wants.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m fine if you want to pay for the parks &#8212; institute a user fee.  But, to continually tax me &amp; my family for parks we&#8217;ve never seen, much less use?  This kind of government entitlement thought process is bringing our country to our knees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

