<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freeways to Parks &amp; Parkways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cityparksblog.org/2009/07/07/freeways-to-parks-parkways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2009/07/07/freeways-to-parks-parkways/</link>
	<description>A Chronicle of the Urban Parks Movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Building More Freeways to reduce traffic?? &#171; Urbinsanity</title>
		<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2009/07/07/freeways-to-parks-parkways/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Building More Freeways to reduce traffic?? &#171; Urbinsanity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cityparksblog.org/?p=914#comment-1684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it they will come&#8221; theory. And I guess I am not the only one who feels this way. According to this, there are a few places starting to think a little [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it they will come&#8221; theory. And I guess I am not the only one who feels this way. According to this, there are a few places starting to think a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleen</title>
		<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2009/07/07/freeways-to-parks-parkways/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coleen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cityparksblog.org/?p=914#comment-509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently Baltimore is thinking about tearing down a mile-long stretch of the Jones Falls Expressway (http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.jfx17may17,0,7643521.story).

There is also the &quot;Highway to Nowhere&quot; in West Baltimore, an unfinished section of what was to be an extension of I-70 into the city, is now designated as part of U.S. 40.  Mayor Dixon wants to get rid of that too.

And there is also a highway in Milwaukee that was removed and turned into a Boulevard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Baltimore is thinking about tearing down a mile-long stretch of the Jones Falls Expressway (<a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.jfx17may17,0,7643521.story" rel="nofollow">http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.jfx17may17,0,7643521.story</a>).</p>
<p>There is also the &#8220;Highway to Nowhere&#8221; in West Baltimore, an unfinished section of what was to be an extension of I-70 into the city, is now designated as part of U.S. 40.  Mayor Dixon wants to get rid of that too.</p>
<p>And there is also a highway in Milwaukee that was removed and turned into a Boulevard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Simes</title>
		<link>http://cityparksblog.org/2009/07/07/freeways-to-parks-parkways/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Simes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cityparksblog.org/?p=914#comment-496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cincinnati&#039;s Fort Washington Way which connects I-71 with I-75 near Cincinnati&#039;s riverfront would merit removal.  Luckily for Cincinnati they decided to consolidate and bury that stretch of highway a few years ago.  Once capped the highway won&#039;t even be noticeable, but I think could still merit removal as it could be replaced by a buried high-speed rail station in the heart of Cincinnati&#039;s center city.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cincinnati&#8217;s Fort Washington Way which connects I-71 with I-75 near Cincinnati&#8217;s riverfront would merit removal.  Luckily for Cincinnati they decided to consolidate and bury that stretch of highway a few years ago.  Once capped the highway won&#8217;t even be noticeable, but I think could still merit removal as it could be replaced by a buried high-speed rail station in the heart of Cincinnati&#8217;s center city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

